top of page
  • Writer's pictureAntoine Jones

Trump's Policy of Strengthening America: Unveiling an Ingenious Underlying Strategy

Analyzing the Dynamics of Global Competition and the Need for American Strength

Former President Donald Trump's policy of making America stronger elicited diverse responses, but it contained an underlying strategic insight into the competitive nature of global relations. Trump recognized that despite America's best intentions in engaging with the world through alliances like NATO, the innate human drive for competition and feelings of inferiority would often lead other countries to betray or undermine the United States. This article aims to shed light on the rationale behind Trump's approach, highlighting the complexities of international relations and the imperative for America to maintain its strength.

Trump's understanding of competitive instincts and the dynamics of global power balances revealed an astute grasp of human nature. While America's allies may outwardly profess loyalty, they too are driven by their own national interests and ambitions, often displaying characteristics of frenemies. Let us explore examples from key U.S. allies where their actions have demonstrated this complex dynamic:

1. United Kingdom: The UK's decision to allow Chinese telecom giant Huawei to participate in its 5G network infrastructure, despite security concerns raised by the United States, revealed conflicting interests. It highlighted the UK's desire to maintain economic ties with China, even at the expense of potential intelligence risks and strained relations with its key ally.

2. Germany: Germany's continued support for the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, which strengthens Russia's energy grip on Europe, contradicted efforts to reduce European dependence on Russian energy. This move raised questions about Germany's commitment to a unified European approach and highlighted diverging interests within the alliance.

3. Canada: Canada's limited contributions to defense spending, falling short of NATO targets, strained relations with the United States. This discrepancy in burden-sharing undermined collective security efforts within the alliance and raised concerns about Canada's dedication to shared objectives.

4. Turkey: Turkey's decision to purchase the Russian S-400 missile defense system, despite objections from NATO allies, posed significant challenges. This move not only compromised NATO's interoperability but also demonstrated a willingness to prioritize national interests over collective defense objectives.

5. South Korea: South Korea's engagement with North Korea, such as the Kaesong Industrial Complex, created concerns about potential support inadvertently reaching the North Korean regime. This demonstrated a delicate balancing act between seeking peaceful engagement and the interests of its key ally, the United States.

These examples illustrate the complex nature of alliances, where allies often prioritize their own interests over collective goals. While not outright betrayals, these actions and inconsistencies highlight the challenges faced in maintaining unity within the alliances.

The psychological component in these power dynamics can be explored through various phenomena. For instance, there may be feelings of envy or a desire to see a rival ally, such as the United States, lose its position of dominance. This psychological phenomenon of "Tall Poppy Syndrome" is a cultural phenomenon where individuals or nations seek to bring down those who stand out or excel.

Moreover, power dynamics and competition can fuel a desire to prove one's own worth and gain recognition. Allies may engage in actions that harm the United States to elevate their own standing or assert their independence within the alliance. This complex interplay of emotions, ambitions, and competitive instincts shapes the behavior of frenemies within alliances.

America's historical and current position as a global superpower means it is surrounded by frenemies seeking to exploit perceived weaknesses or take advantage of U.S. resources and technology. To counter this, it is essential for the United States to maintain strength across all fronts. By doing so, it will compel other nations to respect and engage with the United States from a position of strength rather than seeking opportunities to undermine it. The psychological dynamics at play in these frenemy relationships cannot be underestimated.

In the case of the United Kingdom, historical remnants of its once mighty empire may fuel a subconscious desire to challenge the United States as a global power. The UK's decision to engage with China despite security concerns may stem from a desire to regain economic influence and assert independence from its transatlantic ally. This combination of historical pride, economic ambition, and a quest for relevance on the global stage can lead to decisions that undermine the United States.

Germany's position as an economic powerhouse within the European Union has fostered a sense of self-assurance and independent thinking. The pursuit of its national interests, including the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, reflects a strategic calculation aimed at securing energy resources and maintaining economic stability. While Germany remains a key ally, its actions demonstrate a willingness to prioritize its own economic objectives over unity within the alliance.

Canada, often seen as a close neighbor and partner to the United States, has at times struggled to balance its own interests with those of its southern ally. Its limited defense spending raises questions about its commitment to collective security. This may stem from a desire to maintain a distinct national identity and protect its social welfare programs. While Canada's intentions may not be hostile, the disparities in defense investment can strain the alliance and contribute to a sense of being taken advantage of by its frenemy.

Turkey's geographical position at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, combined with its historical legacy as a powerful empire, has shaped its complex relationship with the United States. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's pursuit of an independent foreign policy and his desire to establish Turkey as a regional power have led to decisions that challenge the interests of its NATO allies. The acquisition of the S-400 missile defense system from Russia exemplifies Turkey's pursuit of self-interest, even at the expense of jeopardizing the alliance.

South Korea's delicate dance with North Korea demonstrates the complexities of maintaining a stable relationship with a neighbor that poses both security threats and opportunities for engagement. While South Korea remains a steadfast ally, its cautious approach to North Korea reflects a desire to avoid conflict and maintain stability on the Korean Peninsula. Balancing its relationship with the United States and its efforts to foster peace with its neighbor can strain the alliance and create complexities in the bilateral relationship.

Understanding the psychological and historical factors at play in these frenemy relationships is essential for grasping the complexities of international alliances. The United States must navigate these dynamics with a clear-eyed approach, recognizing that while allies may share common goals, they also possess their own aspirations, ambitions, and insecurities. A strong America, capable of leading in various domains, will command respect and encourage allies to engage on more equal terms.

As the global landscape grows increasingly complex, the United States finds itself navigating a delicate web of alliances and partnerships. Former President Donald Trump's policy of making America stronger presented an ingenious strategy that recognized the competitive nature of global relations. In furtherance of the main point, we delve deeper into the intricacies of this approach, shedding light on the historical and current factors that support the notion of maintaining American strength as a critical component in preserving the integrity of alliances. By examining economic exploitation, technology leakage, competing regional interests, threats from hybrid warfare, and the psychological dynamics at play, we can further comprehend the rationale behind Trump's policy and its importance in safeguarding the nation's position on the world stage.

Economic Exploitation: Allies may sometimes exploit the United States economically, taking advantage of its resources, technologies, and market access while providing limited reciprocity. This can be observed in trade imbalances and intellectual property infringements. The strategic insight of Trump's policy recognized the need for America to protect its economic interests and ensure fair and balanced trade relationships to prevent exploitation and safeguard its national security.

Technology Leakage: The United States, known for its technological advancements, often collaborates with allies on research and development projects. However, there have been instances where technology transfer has inadvertently benefited rival nations or resulted in the erosion of America's technological edge. Trump's emphasis on protecting intellectual property and promoting domestic innovation aimed to safeguard American technological leadership and prevent its allies from inadvertently aiding competitors.

Competing Regional Interests: The complex geopolitical landscape gives rise to competing regional interests among allies. Conflicting priorities and the pursuit of regional influence can strain alliance cohesion. For instance, tensions in the Middle East have at times led to divergent approaches among key allies such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel. These competing interests highlight the need for the United States to prioritize its own strategic objectives to ensure its influence remains intact.

Threats from Hybrid Warfare: Modern warfare has evolved to include hybrid tactics, blending conventional military capabilities with unconventional means such as cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and economic coercion. The United States, as a global power, faces threats on multiple fronts. Trump's policy aimed to bolster America's defense capabilities and resilience, recognizing the importance of being strong across various domains to counteract hybrid warfare and protect national interests.

Psychological Factors: The psychological dynamics within alliances cannot be overlooked. Envy, pride, and perceptions of relative power can influence decision-making processes. Allies may feel compelled to challenge the United States' dominance, even at the cost of undermining or betraying their alliance. Trump's policy recognized the need to project strength and ensure that allies perceive the United States as a force to be reckoned with, deterring any notions of exploiting its perceived weakness.

In conclusion, the policy pursued by President Donald Trump to make America stronger unveiled an ingenious strategy rooted in an astute understanding of the competitive nature of global relations. Drawing from historical events and current realities, this approach emphasizes the vital importance of maintaining American strength to navigate the complexities of power dynamics within alliances. By prioritizing economic protection, technological security, and national interests, the United States can mitigate the risk of betrayal, safeguard its position in the world, and promote a more balanced and mutually beneficial international order. This strategic approach acknowledges the influence of psychological factors, historical legacies, and competitive instincts that shape alliances, and underscores the necessity for the United States to maintain its strength and ensure fair engagement with allies based on mutual respect and shared objectives.

Top Stories

bottom of page